Reveals a high distrust of authoritarian rule.
Because the system itself only provides a basic framework for the reform of the political system, it is possible to design new policies instead of the old ones without using violence.
The above is the sixth reading note of the open society.
(In ancient Greece, philosophy was the assembly of all knowledge, and philosophers were therefore regarded as the most intelligent.) Not so in the book.
He said that the so-called wisdom is only to realize: how little I know! Here in Plato, a philosopher is not a modest pursuer of truth, but a possessor of truth.
He can know the eternal and sacred metaphysics behind things, and is an omnipotent person who is half god and half man.
How can we design a system to cultivate outstanding rulers? Interestingly, Plato and his teacher Socrates have completely different definitions of philosophers.
I like every compliment you have!.
.
Later, a long sleeve is not afraid of the temperature.
Specifically, this philosopher is not the possessor of truth, but the modest pursuer and lover of truth.
In other words, the system is only a framework, not a specific policy.
Socrates’ philosopher has the spirit of science.
Because of this, an omniscient philosopher can become a ruler and lead to totalitarianism.
He envisaged that by training the leadership of the ruler through education, he was making the educational system bear the requirements beyond its ability.
The problem that the system can’t achieve the expected results.
The effectiveness of the new system depends on the wisdom and moral level of the makers.
In Plato’s imagination, the supreme ruler is the most powerful and unrestrained, so it must be the most intelligent philosopher.
The running on the fifth day of the Chinese New Year should have been issued on the same day.
First, it was almost impossible to select the most intelligent ruler.
I hope this time it can be issued on the fifth day of the Chinese New Year.
This time, I will talk about how a country chooses its ruler.
The last running caprice talked about the concept of how to treat social norms in an open society.
The perfect country envisioned by Plato needs to solidify the class, maintain the purity of the ruling class and not fade, so who will be the supreme ruler is a very important matter.
These criticisms are actually in the wrong direction.
Therefore, these criticisms should be directed at the decision-makers under the system rather than the system itself.
After reading the article, please click “like” and “watching” at the end of the article.
Pay attention to me and see what else you think.
The ruling system should restrict the possible bad rulers; Secondly, the supreme ruler cannot have unlimited power and must rely on others, so he can completely restrict the supreme ruling power; Finally, although the system is not perfect, it is necessary to prevent the despicability of authoritarian rule.
In fact, Plato’s selection of the most intelligent rulers is a quite difficult problem, and it is basically impossible to build such a system.
Clicking on it is the encouragement to me.
Relatively speaking, to change the policy in an authoritarian country, if the new policy indicates the error of the old policy, it means that the authority that formulated the old policy has made a mistake, then the introduction of the new policy will be more difficult.
I wish you all good fortune! It’s two degrees below zero in the morning.
The low temperature alone can’t stop the runners.
It is the day when the god of wealth comes.
He argued from the necessity, feasibility, and necessity that democracy should replace the authoritarian rule of philosophers.
But the system does not guarantee that a country or a policy will achieve good results, so some people attack the democratic system.
Recently, I saw the “India: Why the system doesn’t work” in the second chapter of Liu Yu’s “The Art of Possibility”, which also talked about the case of unsuccessful implementation of the system.
Moreover, he has self-knowledge.