Background: A company requires running or reading books, and needs to complete clocking in before going to work, which affects performance.
Runmeter performance? “Companies cannot use their employees’ private time to ‘strive for improvement’.
Today’s article deeply analyzes the harm of using corporate culture as a mandatory regulation from multiple perspectives, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions.
You can study carefully and accumulate corresponding materials.
“Workers’ rights and interests” concern everyone and are also a hot topic in the civil service examination.
A good corporate culture can indeed effectively help employees better integrate into the team, improve job satisfaction, and promote the stable development of the company.
Sub argument: Explain one of the hazards of linking running to performance – running is not suitable for all employees, and integrating it into performance appraisal results in a loss of temperature and humanistic care in the “corporate culture”.
Some companies provide facilities such as gyms and reading spaces to encourage employees to focus on their physical and mental health after work.
At the same time, it should be changed to a reward mechanism.
Sub argument: Explain that under punitive management, workplace control has broken through the boundaries of work, and is an arbitrary way of treating employees as attachments to the enterprise, which has been suspected of infringement.
What do you think of this phenomenon? Let’s take a look at today’s article.
“I love learning to explain that corporate culture is crucial to the long-term development of the company.”.
At the same time, many enterprises also regularly organize employee training, sharing sessions, and other activities to help employees improve their skills and broaden their horizons.
However, when implementing corporate culture, companies need to take into account the needs and feelings of employees to fully play the positive role of corporate culture.
More important than running, it is to respect employees’ right to choose whether to run or not.
If included in the performance appraisal, it should not become mandatory to promote, let alone occupy employees’ private time.
More and more enterprises are beginning to pay attention to the physical and mental health and personal growth of employees.
This has caused controversy.”.
Sub argument: To reiterate the core argument of this article, running and reading should not be elevated to company regulations imposed on employees.
The completion status will affect the final performance appraisal of employees.
This incident has sparked discussions about the tension between corporate culture and employee rights, and the company’s approach has caused widespread controversy.
Extraction code: n08o.
.
Sub argument: Describe the company’s measures and suggestions for encouraging employees to run and read.
Sub argument: The second hazard of linking running to performance – interfering with employees’ private time – is to transfer the cost of corporate culture construction to workers’ private time.
Conclusion: Reaffirm the core point of this article and sublimate the theme – to strengthen the protection of workers’ rights and interests, enterprises should strengthen self-discipline.
Core argument: Describe the core argument of this article – companies should not impose rigid constraints on employees’ private lives in the way of corporate systems.
– 2023 – [Daily Review] Running meter performance? A company cannot occupy employees’ private time to “strive for improvement” Preface: A company stipulates that employees must run 20 morning runs every month, each time for 3 kilometers.