Having said that is equivalent to not saying that Zhou Lian believes that when Hegel said “everything that is reasonable is realistic, and everything that is realistic is reasonable”, he should understand that the space for interpretation of this sentence is very large, It is very likely to be interpreted as “everything that exists is reasonable”.
The last time running Capriccio 299 | Utopian Dream (Open Society Reading Notes 7) Popper refuted Utopianism and believed in what he called “sporadic projects”.
Plum blossoms all the way, red plum, yellow plum and white plum are colorful.
Hegel has become the royal philosopher of Prussia.
I like every compliment you have!.
.
To be honest, Kant and other earlier philosophers, although their articles are also very difficult to read, their conclusions can still be understood.
But I still suggest you read it slowly.
Hegel could not have been unaware of such misreading.
After reading, please click “like” and “looking” at the end of the article at will.
The above is the eighth reading note of Popper’s Open Society.
I really don’t feel his greatness.
He allowed such misreading to occur.
The topic of this run is “Why do I steal music?”.
The king insisted that all academic research should be subject to the national interests, and clearly kept consistent with them.
Hegel’s worship of the country, history and nation and his opposition to freedom and rationality were supported by the Prussian regime at that time.
It seems to be true, but it doesn’t seem to say anything real.
I ran into a big circle of wetlands.
From Zhoujia Village to Shoudi and then to Hongyuan area, it is also free of charge.
Therefore, whenever I see articles criticizing Hegel’s philosophy, I will enjoy it while reading, and finally understand that I am not alone in hating him! Can’t understand his greatness! Pay attention to me and see what else you think.
The click is to encourage me to take advantage of the free opening of Xixi Wetland, run to Gaozhuang and can’t help but go west, and then arrive at the boundary of Zhoujia Village.
In order to maintain the autocratic rule of King William III, he created a philosophical theory with contradictory words to support it.
It is like saying that A is A, and a bachelor is an unmarried man.
The second volume of the open society began to criticize Hegel.
Zhou Lian talked about Hegel’s famous saying “what exists is reasonable”.
He said: if this statement is true, then everything that exists, from the autocratic monarchy to the censorship of books and newspapers, from various serial killers to the Auschwitz concentration camp, is reasonable.
If you are interested, you can go to see the evaluation of his famous dialectics in this book.
He praised the time of King William III of Prussia at that time and said that the whole human history reached the peak of freedom at that time.
Let me feel good about all of you.
The answer to the question is at the end of this note.
Is Hegel really so reactionary and confused? Zhou Lian explained that for Hegel, many things that exist are only accidental, and only certain things can be called reality.
Later, as a result, it was moral irresponsibility.
This book criticizes Hegel for nothing, pointing out that he is the royal philosopher of the Kingdom of Prussia.
If you are eager to know, you can directly pull the last.
Some people say that failing to recognize the greatness of Hegel is failing to understand Hegel.
Engels criticized that the sanctification of all existing things is to bless the autocratic system, the police state, the royal justice and the book and newspaper inspection system in philosophy.
It is a tautology.
Schopenhauer also said that the government has made philosophy a means of serving its national interests, and scholars have made it a trade.
Is Hegel really that bad? Where is his greatness? Recall that I read the book “Open: Zhou Lian’s 100 Western Philosophy Lessons” by the male theologian Zhou Lian before, and also talked about Hegel, and then turn it over again to see how the male theologian Zhou evaluated Hegel.
Haydn); At first, it was intellectual dishonesty.
The feeling of disgust with philosophy brought by Hegel’s philosophy should also be attributed to his tongue twitching and illusory words.
Everything that is necessary is reasonable.
Looking back at Popper, he quoted the words of two other scholars and summarized Hegel’s success as the beginning of the “era of dishonesty” (Schopenhauer) and the “era of irresponsibility” (K.
So when Hegel said “everything that is realistic is reasonable”, his real meaning was that everything that is “inevitable is reasonable”.
The witness Schopenhauer commented on Hegel: He was so brazen that he scribbled and pieced together some crazy and mysterious nonsense The expansion of Hegel’s influence in the spiritual field may lead to the fall of the whole generation.
After reading the article introducing Hegel’s philosophy, I really don’t know why.
It can be seen how serious the bad influence caused by Hegel is! In addition to Popper, Schopenhauer, and Russell, it is said that he once claimed that Hegel’s philosophy was almost wrong without a sense of humor.
To tell the truth, I really haven’t understood what Hegel’s philosophy thought said.
Finally, I cut a screen to end my criticism of Hegel.
The sentence “what exists is reasonable” inevitably leads to the conclusion that “what exists is right”.
Popper believes that Hegel’s theory of “what exists is reasonable” is that power is axiom.